Civil Procedure: Federal Question Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1331)
Studicata Studicata
47.2K subscribers
12,567 views
210

 Published On Sep 12, 2023

📄 FREE CIVIL PROCEDURE OUTLINE

Download here: link coming soon.


📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP

Law school prep: https://studicata.com/get-started/law...
Bar exam prep: https://studicata.com/get-started/bar...


🤝 CONNECT WITH YOUR INSTRUCTOR

Michael's Instagram:   / studicataguy  


❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS

Community: https://studicata.com/groups/community
Testimonials: https://studicata.com/testimonials-an...
Submit a review: https://shoutout.studicata.com


📱 TECH

iOS app: https://studicata.com/ios
Android app: https://studicata.com/android


📣 ABOUT

Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more—Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.

Email: [email protected]

Learn more: https://studicata.com


🎬 VIDEO INFO

Civil Procedure: Federal Question Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1331)

00:00 Introduction
00:10 Requirements for a Court to Hear and Decide a Case
00:50 How a Federal Court Obtains Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
01:47 Components of Federal Question Jurisdiction
02:54 Constitutional Component (Article III, § 2)
04:07 Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 22 U.S. 738 (1824)
06:56 Statutory Component (28 U.S.C. § 1331)
08:00 "Arise Under" Federal Law Requirement
10:07 Well-Pleaded Complaint Rule
10:28 Louisville & Nashville R.R. Company v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908)
13:51 Defendant's Response is Irrelevant
17:35 Significance Rule
19:28 Creation Test
22:23 Grable Test
24:41 Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804 (1986)
28:41 Grable & Sons Metal Prods., Inc. v. Darue Eng'g & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005)
36:38 Conclusion


Primary sources of law for this video:

See U.S. Const. art. III, § 2; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331-1332, 1367.
See U.S. Const. amend. IV, § 1; International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945).
See 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
Osborn v. U.S. Bank, 22 U.S. 738 (1824).
See American Well Works v. Layne, 241 U.S. 257 (1916).
See Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908).
E.g., Franchise Tax Bd. v. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 (1983); Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386 (1987); Holmes Grp., v. Vornado Air Circulation Sys., Inc., 535 U.S. 826 (2002).
See Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804 (1986).
See Grable & Sons Metal Prods., Inc. v. Darue Eng'g & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005).

Learn more: https://studicata.com

show more

Share/Embed