Civil Procedure: Diversity Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332) (Pt 2: Amount in Controversy Requirement)
Studicata Studicata
47.2K subscribers
5,087 views
75

 Published On Oct 27, 2023

📄 FREE CIVIL PROCEDURE OUTLINE

Download here: link coming soon.


📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP

Law school prep: https://studicata.com/get-started/law...
Bar exam prep: https://studicata.com/get-started/bar...


🤝 CONNECT WITH YOUR INSTRUCTOR

Michael's Instagram:   / studicataguy  


❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS

Community: https://studicata.com/groups/community
Testimonials: https://studicata.com/testimonials-an...
Submit a review: https://shoutout.studicata.com


📱 TECH

iOS app: https://studicata.com/ios
Android app: https://studicata.com/android


📣 ABOUT

Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more—Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.

Email: [email protected]

Learn more: https://studicata.com


🎬 VIDEO INFO

Civil Procedure: Diversity Jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332) (Pt 2: Amount in Controversy Requirement)

00:00 Introduction
00:18 Requirements for a Court to Hear and Decide a Case
00:41 How a Federal Court Obtains Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
01:53 Diversity Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332
05:13 Amount in Controversy Requirement Overview
06:46 Exclusion of Interests and Costs
15:38 Legal Certainty Test
25:51 Actions for Equitable Relief
28:40 Practice Problem 1.0
32:59 Aggregation of Claims
34:42 Determining Whether Claims can be Aggregated
37:18 Single P Joins Multiple Claims Against Single D
38:49 Multiple Parties Joined on 1 or More Claims
42:11 Practice Problem 2.0
47:29 Practice Problem 3.0
50:00 Practice Problem 4.0
51:29 Defendant Counterclaims Against Plaintiff
51:54 Practice Problem 5.0
53:12 Test-Taking Strategy
55:49 Conclusion

Primary sources of law for this video:

28 U.S.C. § 1332.
14B Wright Miller, Fed. Prac. Proc. § 3725 (3d ed. 1998).
Bronner v. Duggan, 364 F. Supp. 3d 9, 22 n.13 (D.D.C. 2019).
St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 288-89 (1938).
Tongkook America, Inc. v. Shipton Sportswear, 14 F.3d 781, 785 (2d Cir. 1994).
McDonald v. Patton, 240 F.2d 424, 426 (4th Cir. 1957).
Deutsch v. Hewes Street Realty Corporation, 359 F.2d 96, 100 (2d Cir. 1966).
McCarty v. Amoco Pipeline Co., 595 F.2d 389, 392 (7th Cir. 1979).
Ronzio v. Denver R.G.W.R. Co., 116 F.2d 604 (10th Cir. 1940).
Jewell v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co., 290 F.2d 11, 13 (5th Cir. 1961).
Morrison v. Allstate Indem. Co., 228 F.3d 1255, 1263 n.7 (11th Cir. 2000).
Cornell v. Mabe, 206 F.2d 514, 516-17 (5th Cir. 1953).


Learn more: https://studicata.com

show more

Share/Embed