FALLACIES OF PRESUMPTION | LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING |For Freshman Students | part 5
HaBesha TechCamp HaBesha TechCamp
33.2K subscribers
32,642 views
257

 Published On Premiered Aug 3, 2022

እንኳን ወደ ቻናላችን መጡ ይህን ምርጥ ቻናል ሰብስክራይብ በማድረግ ይቀላቀሉ

T E L E G R A M group - https://t.me/htc_129
T E L E G R A M channel https://t.me/HabeshaTechcamp




እንኳን ወደ ቻናላችን መጡ ይህን ምርጥ ቻናል ሰብስክራይብ በማድረግ ይቀላቀሉ

send videos with our T E L E G R A M group - https://t.me/htc_129
T E L E G R A M channel https://t.me/HabeshaTechcamp





Copyright Disclaimer:

Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.



ATC TUBE, Ethiopian Education, atc tube



malonic ester synthesis, acetoacetic ester synthesis,homeowners insurance quote,auto insurance quotes,funniest south park episodes,paramount+ tv shows
,behind her eyes season 2,apple music windows,south park funny moments,hilarious tiktok videos,funny people on tiktok,funniest tik toks,



fallacy, fallacia, informal fallacy , definition of fallacy, types of fallacy, fallacy of relevance, for freshman student, Fallacies of Relevance, Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad Baculum: Appeal to the „„Stick‟‟), Appeal to Pity (Argumentum ad Misericordiam)
,Appeal to the People (Argumentum ad Populum), Bandwagon fallacy, Appeal to Vanity, Argument against the Person (Argumentum ad Hominem), Ad Hominem Abusive Fallacy, Ad Hominem Circumstantial Fallacy, Tu Quoque (You too) Fallacy
, Accident, Missing the Point (Ignoratio Elenchi), Red Herring, Fallacies of Weak Induction , Appeal to Unqualified Authority (Argumentum ad Verecundiam), Appeal to Ignorance (Argumentum ad Ignorantiam), Hasty Generalization (Converse Accident), False Cause, Slippery Slope, Weak Analogy, Fallacies of Presumption, Begging the Question (Petitio Principii), Complex Question, False Dichotomy, Suppressed Evidence, Fallacies of Ambiguity, Equivocation
, Amphiboly, Fallacies of Grammatical Analogy, Composition
, Division


The fallacies of relevance share the common characteristic- that the arguments, in which they occur, have premises that are logically irrelevant to the conclusion. Yet the premises are relevant psychologically, so the conclusion may seem to follow from the premises, even though it does
not follow logically. In a good argument the premises provide genuine evidence in support of the conclusion. In an argument that commits a fallacy of relevance, on the other hand, the connection between premises and conclusion is emotional,

The first type of fallacy of relevance is appeal to force. It occurs when an arguer poses a conclusion to another person and tells that person either implicitly or explicitly that some harm will come to him if he does not accept the conclusion. In other words it occurs when a conclusion defended by a threat to the well- being of those who do not accept the conclusion.

The second type of fallacy relevant is appeal to pity. The appeal to pity (or ad misericordiam fallacy) is the attempt to support a conclusion merely by evoking pity in one‘s audience when the statements that evoke the pity are logically unrelated to the conclusion. The appeal to pity is not, generally speaking, very subtle,

Nearly everyone wants to be loved, esteemed, admired, valued, recognized, and accepted by others. Feeling of being part of community and belongingness are some of the most important humans needs. The appeal to the people strikes these desires and needs to get acceptance for conclusion. Or the appeal to the people (or ad populum fallacy) is an attempt to persuade a person (or group) by appealing to these desires and needs. Consider the following argument.





#Eregnaye
እረኛዬ ክፍል - Eregnaye Ep
@Arts Tv World

እረኛዬ ክፍል - Eregnaye Ep @Arts Tv World

show more

Share/Embed